Tulpa as red-herring?
From doktorsleepless
Tulpa as red-herring?
Posted by eschatonic.water on June 20, 2008 at 2:21am
- Speculation:
- John Reinhart "left Heavenside i search of wisdom," making his way to the Amazon basin, because :: "magic still dwelled there". He was seeking, and presumably found, in the person of Don Bastrardo, instruction/guidance in magick.
- But then we have the tale of the tulpa. If John Reinhart created a tulpa for Preston Stoker to arrest - or sent one or more tulpas out into the world prior to being arrested by Preston Stoker - then he was already practicing advanced magick before "he" left Heavenside. The tulpa story may be a ruse; what if Reinhart "merely" found a way to create one or more mature clones himself and to transmit his memories and thoughts into it/them? Our first glimpse into Dok's lab (Issue #1) reveals what looks like a slightly-decomposed-or-perhaps-mutated human body in a large glass container. (It's possible this might just be part of the Doktor's Mad Scientist "set dressing".) And we've seen at least one Grinder with telepathic abilities (Issue #3).
- Or, a possibly more mundane answer - one which explains why John has seemed to be a different person at different times, even to those who knew and loved him: Maybe "John" has never been one person, but a set of identical siblings (quadruplets?) who share(d) a common identity: Doktor Sleepless himself, the John Reinhart languishing in Room 23 of the St. Thomas Institute, "[t]he John Reinhart who died in a hotel room in Hamburg," and possibly one we haven't yet encountered,
- "[t]he one who never actually went to the Amazon at all".
- In any case, it seems that Doktor Sleepless and the John Reinhart in St. Thomas's, at least, can communicate on some level; while talking to Preston Stoker, Dok refers to the tale of Alexandra David-Neel and her tulpa the monk, as though he was aware in advance that Stoker had the necessary frame-of-reference.
Reply by Mike Hills on June 20, 2008 at 11:32am
- very interesting.. i do like the idea of JR/DS being some sort of synchronized group mind, with multiple independent instances.. i like that A LOT
- (could this tie into the "important junk" DS has in his head?)
- this would also make the Shrieky Girls just a primitive prototype, yes?
Reply by Spiraltwist on June 20, 2008 at 9:24pm
- If John Reinhart created a tulpa for Preston Stoker to arrest - or sent one or more tulpas out into the world prior to being arrested by Preston Stoker - then he was already practicing advanced magick before "he" left Heavenside. The tulpa story may be a ruse; what if Reinhart "merely" found a way to create one or more mature clones himself and to transmit his memories and thoughts into it/them? Our first glimpse into Dok's lab (Issue #1) reveals what looks like a slightly-decomposed-or-perhaps-mutated human body in a large glass container. (It's possible this might just be part of the Doktor's Mad Scientist "set dressing".) And we've seen at least one Grinder with telepathic abilities (Issue #3).
- Interesting idea. I've always been intrigued by the bodies behind him, in the vertical tube, (as you have stated) in this cover
- I don't think they are decomposing though - just the opposite.
- What if they are being grown?
eschatonic.water Permalink Reply by eschatonic.water on June 21, 2008 at 7:18am
- What if they are being grown?
- That's kinda what I was hinting at, with my cloning theory. I only said they looked slightly-decomposed-or-perhaps-mutated.
- I hadn't seen this cover before; except for Issue #4, all of mine have had the wrap-around covers. Given what's shown on those (whimsical touches like a "small-crawler-esque" critter reading a science manual, a rat with a lightbulb in its back and a plug at the end of its tail, Nurse Igor [twice] as a Bride-of-Frankenstein project), I've sort of written the covers off as sources of clues.
Reply by Spiraltwist on June 21, 2008 at 3:44pm
- I only said they looked slightly-decomposed-or-perhaps-mutated.
- Sorry, the brain and the eyes must not have connected properly. My apologies.
- I've sort of written the covers off as sources of clues.
- I wouldn't. Ellis has said that there are clues in the covers (and I can't remember where I read that, or else I would link to it). I don't think he would leave the covers totally up to the artists - they are designed to show a scene for a reason, we just need to figure the reason out.
- Check out all the covers here. I'm pretty anal about getting them up, and I ask the folks at Avatar to post them, if they are not in their flickr stream.
Reply by Ian 'Cat' Vincent on June 22, 2008 at 11:26pm
- I seem to recall Warren also saying the alternate covers should not be considered as canon - but of course that doesn't preclude the idea of them containing clues.
- As for your central thesis... oh yeah. Very possible. Especially the whole tulpa-tale as misdirection.
Return to Secret Speculation IV.
